CARDIAC DISEASE PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING: A COMPREHENSIVE MULTI-MODEL CLINICAL EVALUATION WITH RECALL OPTIMIZATION
Keywords:
cardiac disease prediction, machine learning, deep learning, recall optimisation, SMOTE, Extra Trees, XGBoost, clinical feature engineering, class imbalance, risk stratificationAbstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, claiming approximately 17.9 million deaths annually. Early detection of high-risk individuals is critical to reducing mortality rates, yet this remains challenging due to the multifactorial and nonlinear nature of cardiac risk. This paper presents a comprehensive review and experimental evaluation of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches for cardiac disease prediction, examining 32 model configurations systematically assessed across a five-phase study on 10,585 patient records characterised by 26 clinical variables. Starting from baseline classifiers and building toward ensemble methods, neural networks, automated hyperparameter tuning, probability calibration, and a clinically motivated recall-maximisation framework, the work traces the incremental contribution of each methodological step. Four primary contributions are synthesised: (i) three engineered composite features—Clinical Risk Score, Cardiac Load, and Metabolic Index—constructed from cardiovascular domain knowledge and validated through mutual information analysis; (ii) a comparative evaluation of four class-imbalance correction strategies, from standard SMOTE to an aggressive 3× oversampling scheme with asymmetric cost weighting; (iii) isotonic probability calibration enabling a validated three-tier patient risk stratification in which the high-risk tier demonstrates a 94.2% observed cardiac event rate; and (iv) a threshold-adjusted Random Forest achieving 99.21% sensitivity, with only 6 of 755 confirmed cardiac events undetected. This review demonstrates that data preparation—specifically clinical feature engineering and class-imbalance correction—contributes more to predictive performance than model architecture choice, and traces a reproducible path from general-purpose ML classifiers toward a clinically oriented, patient-safety-governed screening tool.